AI Screenr
AI Interview for Art Teachers

AI Interview for Art Teachers — Automate Screening & Hiring

Automate art teacher screening with AI interviews. Evaluate lesson planning, classroom management, and differentiated instruction — get scored hiring recommendations in minutes.

Try Free
By AI Screenr Team·

Trusted by innovative companies

eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela
eprovement
Jobrela

The Challenge of Screening Art Teachers

Hiring art teachers involves sifting through candidates who often provide surface-level answers about curriculum design and classroom management. The process is time-consuming, with repeated interviews to gauge their ability to integrate state standards, manage diverse classrooms, and effectively communicate with families. Many candidates struggle to demonstrate a true understanding of differentiated instruction and formative assessment strategies, leading to wasted time on inadequate candidates.

AI interviews streamline the screening process by allowing candidates to showcase their skills in curriculum and lesson design, classroom management, and family engagement. The AI delves into these areas, asking tailored follow-up questions and generating scored evaluations. This enables you to replace screening calls and quickly identify qualified art teachers, ensuring that only the most promising candidates proceed to the next stage of your hiring process.

What to Look for When Screening Art Teachers

Crafting lesson plans aligned with state standards like Common Core and TEKS.
Implementing classroom management strategies with de-escalation techniques and proactive routines.
Designing differentiated instruction to cater to diverse student abilities and learning styles.
Creating formative and summative assessments with data-informed instructional adjustments.
Facilitating family and guardian communication with a focus on cultural sensitivity.
Utilizing digital platforms like Google Classroom for resource sharing and assignments.
Incorporating edtech tools such as Nearpod and Kahoot into interactive lessons.
Advocating for the art program with innovative budgeting for limited supplies.
Integrating digital art tools to expand student expression beyond traditional media.
Evaluating student progress with a balance of project-based and choice-based learning approaches.

Automate Art Teachers Screening with AI Interviews

AI Screenr conducts voice interviews tailored for art teachers, probing curriculum design and classroom management. Weak answers prompt deeper exploration. Discover more with our automated candidate screening.

Curriculum Design Probes

Adaptive questioning on lesson planning, state standards alignment, and project-based instruction.

Classroom Management Scoring

Evaluates strategies for de-escalation and proactive routines, with a 0-10 scoring system.

Instant Evaluation Reports

Comprehensive reports include strengths, risks, and actionable insights within minutes.

Three steps to your perfect art teacher

Get started in just three simple steps — no setup or training required.

1

Post a Job & Define Criteria

Craft your art teacher job post with essential skills like lesson planning aligned to state standards, classroom management, and differentiated instruction. Or input your job description and let AI set up the screening automatically.

2

Share the Interview Link

Send the interview link directly to candidates or embed it in your job post. Candidates complete the AI interview on their own time — no scheduling needed, available 24/7. See how it works.

3

Review Scores & Pick Top Candidates

Receive detailed scoring reports for each candidate, including dimension scores and transcript evidence. Shortlist top performers for the next round. Learn more about how scoring works.

Ready to find your perfect art teacher?

Post a Job to Hire Art Teachers

How AI Screening Filters the Best Art Teachers

See how 100+ applicants become your shortlist of 5 top candidates through 7 stages of AI-powered evaluation.

Knockout Criteria

Automatic disqualification for deal-breakers: minimum years of teaching experience, state certification, and work authorization. Candidates who don't meet these move straight to 'No' recommendation, saving hours of manual review.

80/100 candidates remaining

Must-Have Competencies

Each candidate's lesson planning aligned to state standards and classroom management skills are assessed and scored pass/fail with evidence from the interview.

Language Assessment (CEFR)

The AI switches to English mid-interview and evaluates the candidate's communication at the required CEFR level (e.g. B2 or C1), crucial for effective family engagement and student interaction.

Custom Interview Questions

Your team's most important questions are asked to every candidate in consistent order. The AI follows up on vague answers to probe real experience with differentiated instruction and assessment design.

Blueprint Deep-Dive Questions

Pre-configured questions like 'How do you integrate digital tools in art education?' with structured follow-ups. Every candidate receives the same probe depth, enabling fair comparison.

Required + Preferred Skills

Each required skill (lesson planning, classroom management) is scored 0-10 with evidence snippets. Preferred skills (digital art tools, project-based learning) earn bonus credit when demonstrated.

Final Score & Recommendation

Weighted composite score (0-100) with hiring recommendation (Strong Yes / Yes / Maybe / No). Top 5 candidates emerge as your shortlist — ready for in-person demonstration.

Knockout Criteria80
-20% dropped at this stage
Must-Have Competencies65
Language Assessment (CEFR)50
Custom Interview Questions35
Blueprint Deep-Dive Questions25
Required + Preferred Skills12
Final Score & Recommendation5
Stage 1 of 780 / 100

AI Interview Questions for Art Teachers: What to Ask & Expected Answers

When evaluating art teachers — using AI Screenr or traditional methods — it's crucial to probe beyond surface-level creativity and assess their ability to manage a classroom, adapt lessons, and integrate educational technology. These questions are informed by National Core Arts Standards and reflect current educational practices.

1. Curriculum and Lesson Design

Q: "How do you align your lesson plans with state standards and learning outcomes?"

Expected answer: "In my previous role, I aligned lessons with the TEKS standards. For example, when designing a unit on color theory, I used Google Classroom to post resources and assignments. I conducted a pre-assessment using Kahoot to gauge baseline understanding, and then adjusted the pace and depth of subsequent lessons. We saw a 20% improvement in end-of-unit assessments compared to the previous year. By scaffolding instruction and using digital tools, I ensured students met the standards while engaging them with interactive content."

Red flag: Candidate is unable to specify any standards or provides a generic response without reference to specific tools or outcomes.


Q: "Describe a successful project-based learning experience you've facilitated."

Expected answer: "At my last school, I developed a mural project that integrated history and art for 7th graders. Using Canvas, students collaborated to research and design mural panels reflecting historical events. I guided them in peer reviews and iterative feedback sessions. The project culminated in a 20% increase in participation compared to traditional assignments. Students reported feeling more connected to the material, evidenced by reflective surveys conducted via Google Forms. This approach cultivated critical thinking and teamwork, aligning well with our school’s learning outcomes."

Red flag: Candidate cannot provide specific examples of project-based learning or lacks measurable outcomes.


Q: "How do you incorporate digital tools into your art lessons?"

Expected answer: "Incorporating digital tools has been a learning curve for me. Previously, I used Nearpod to create interactive presentations and quizzes for my digital art unit. This allowed me to introduce tools like Adobe Spark, which students used to create digital portfolios. The use of digital platforms increased student engagement by 30%, as noted in end-of-semester feedback. I continually seek professional development to improve my integration of technology, ensuring students are exposed to contemporary art-making processes."

Red flag: Candidate defaults to traditional methods and struggles to mention specific digital tools or measurable impacts.


2. Classroom Management

Q: "What strategies do you use for classroom management during art projects?"

Expected answer: "I prioritize establishing clear routines from day one. For instance, in my K-8 art classroom, I implemented a choice-based art-room management system. Students knew to start each class by checking the 'Art Menu' on the board, which outlined available projects and materials. This system reduced transition time by 15% and allowed for smoother class flow. I also conducted weekly reflections with students using Google Forms, enabling me to adjust strategies based on their feedback and maintain a supportive, organized environment."

Red flag: Candidate lacks specific strategies or data to support their classroom management effectiveness.


Q: "How do you handle behavioral issues during class?"

Expected answer: "I employ a proactive approach to minimize disruptions. At my previous school, I used positive reinforcement and a de-escalation technique known as the 'Calm Corner.' Students who felt overwhelmed could take a break there, which reduced incidents by 25%. I also maintained open communication with guardians through regular updates in Schoology. This holistic strategy ensured a positive classroom atmosphere and fostered mutual respect, allowing students to focus on their creative work."

Red flag: Candidate only discusses punitive measures without mentioning restorative practices or communication with guardians.


Q: "How do you create an inclusive classroom environment?"

Expected answer: "Creating an inclusive environment is crucial. I designed lessons that incorporated diverse artists and cultures, using resources from Khan Academy to broaden perspectives. For students with different learning needs, I provided differentiated instruction and used IXL for personalized skill-building exercises. This approach increased participation from underrepresented groups by 18%, as tracked through class participation logs. By valuing each student's background, I foster a classroom where every student feels seen and heard."

Red flag: Candidate fails to address diversity or inclusion, or provides a one-size-fits-all approach.


3. Differentiation and Assessment

Q: "How do you differentiate instruction for varying ability levels?"

Expected answer: "In my classroom, differentiation starts with understanding each student's needs. I used formative assessments via Nearpod to identify skill levels and then tailored activities accordingly. For example, advanced students worked on independent projects using Adobe Illustrator, while others received targeted skill-building exercises. This approach, combined with flexible grouping, improved overall student satisfaction by 22%, as recorded in end-of-unit surveys. My goal is to ensure all students are challenged and supported in their artistic growth."

Red flag: Candidate lacks specific strategies for differentiation or fails to reference assessment tools.


Q: "What methods do you use to assess student progress in art?"

Expected answer: "I use both formative and summative assessments to track progress. For instance, I implemented a portfolio review process where students self-assess using rubrics aligned with the National Core Arts Standards. We used Google Classroom to submit and critique work, which facilitated ongoing dialogue and growth. This method increased student reflection scores by 30% from the start to the end of the semester. By combining peer reviews with self-assessment, I ensure students understand their development and areas for improvement."

Red flag: Candidate relies solely on subjective measures or lacks a structured assessment approach.


4. Family Engagement

Q: "How do you communicate with families about student progress and needs?"

Expected answer: "Effective communication with families is key. I use Schoology to send weekly updates and showcase student work, ensuring transparency and fostering family involvement. During parent-teacher conferences, I present data-driven insights from assessments to discuss student progress. This approach increased parent engagement by 40%, as noted in parent feedback surveys. By maintaining open lines of communication, I build trust and partnerships that support student success beyond the classroom."

Red flag: Candidate has no structured approach or fails to provide examples of communication tools used.


Q: "How do you handle cultural sensitivity in family communications?"

Expected answer: "I approach cultural sensitivity with respect and openness. At my previous school, I ensured all communications were accessible by providing translations in Spanish and Mandarin via Google Translate. This practice increased response rates from non-English-speaking families by 25%. I also hosted multicultural art nights, inviting families to share their traditions, which strengthened community ties. By honoring diverse backgrounds, I create an inclusive environment where all families feel valued and engaged in their children's education."

Red flag: Candidate lacks awareness of cultural diversity or offers generic solutions without specific examples.


Q: "How do you engage families in the art program?"

Expected answer: "Family engagement enriches the art program. I organized annual art exhibitions where students showcased their work and families attended workshops. These events, advertised through Blackboard, increased family attendance by 50% compared to previous years. Additionally, I used surveys to gather feedback and adjust future events, ensuring they meet community needs. By actively involving families, I create a supportive network that celebrates student achievements and fosters a deeper appreciation for the arts."

Red flag: Candidate cannot provide examples of family engagement activities or lacks measurable outcomes.


Red Flags When Screening Art teachers

  • Can't articulate lesson objectives — may struggle to align activities with state standards and measurable learning outcomes
  • No classroom management strategy — indicates potential for chaotic environment, impacting student focus and safety
  • Lacks differentiated instruction examples — suggests difficulty in meeting diverse learning needs and fostering inclusive participation
  • No experience with formative assessments — could miss opportunities for timely feedback and data-driven instructional adjustments
  • Avoids family communication — may lead to misunderstandings and missed opportunities for supportive home-school partnerships
  • Relies solely on traditional media — limits students' exposure to digital tools, hindering modern artistic expression and skill development

What to Look for in a Great Art Teacher

  1. Strong lesson planning skills — crafts engaging lessons that meet state standards and clearly defined learning objectives
  2. Proactive classroom management — employs routines and de-escalation techniques to maintain a positive, focused learning environment
  3. Effective differentiation strategies — tailors instruction to diverse needs, ensuring equitable access and maximizing student potential
  4. Robust assessment design — uses both formative and summative assessments to guide instruction and measure student progress
  5. Culturally sensitive communication — fosters open dialogue with families, respecting diverse backgrounds and enhancing student support

Sample Art Teacher Job Configuration

Here's exactly how an Art Teacher role looks when configured in AI Screenr. Every field is customizable.

Sample AI Screenr Job Configuration

Art Teacher — K-8 School

Job Details

Basic information about the position. The AI reads all of this to calibrate questions and evaluate candidates.

Job Title

Art Teacher — K-8 School

Job Family

Education

Focuses on pedagogy, classroom dynamics, and curriculum development for effective teaching roles.

Interview Template

Educational Expertise Screen

Allows up to 5 follow-ups per question for in-depth educational insights.

Job Description

Seeking a dedicated art teacher to inspire creativity in K-8 students. You'll design engaging art lessons, manage classroom dynamics, and integrate both traditional and digital art tools. Collaborate with other educators to align with curriculum standards.

Normalized Role Brief

Mid-level art educator with 5+ years experience in a K-8 setting. Strong in project-based learning and classroom management, with a focus on creative expression and curriculum alignment.

Concise 2-3 sentence summary the AI uses instead of the full description for question generation.

Skills

Required skills are assessed with dedicated questions. Preferred skills earn bonus credit when demonstrated.

Required Skills

Lesson PlanningClassroom ManagementDifferentiated InstructionFormative and Summative AssessmentFamily Communication

The AI asks targeted questions about each required skill. 3-7 recommended.

Preferred Skills

Digital Art IntegrationProject-Based LearningCultural SensitivityAdvocacy for Arts ProgramsBudget Management

Nice-to-have skills that help differentiate candidates who both pass the required bar.

Must-Have Competencies

Behavioral/functional capabilities evaluated pass/fail. The AI uses behavioral questions ('Tell me about a time when...').

Curriculum Designadvanced

Ability to create engaging, standards-aligned art lessons.

Classroom Managementintermediate

Effective strategies for maintaining a positive learning environment.

Family Engagementintermediate

Skillful communication with families to support student learning.

Levels: Basic = can do with guidance, Intermediate = independent, Advanced = can teach others, Expert = industry-leading.

Knockout Criteria

Automatic disqualifiers. If triggered, candidate receives 'No' recommendation regardless of other scores.

Teaching Experience

Fail if: Less than 2 years of K-8 teaching experience

Minimum experience threshold for effective classroom management.

Availability

Fail if: Cannot start within 1 month

Urgent need to fill the position for the upcoming semester.

The AI asks about each criterion during a dedicated screening phase early in the interview.

Custom Interview Questions

Mandatory questions asked in order before general exploration. The AI follows up if answers are vague.

Q1

Describe a successful art project you led. How did it align with learning outcomes?

Q2

How do you handle classroom disruptions while maintaining a creative environment?

Q3

Tell me about a time you adapted a lesson for diverse learning needs.

Q4

How have you integrated digital tools into your art curriculum?

Open-ended questions work best. The AI automatically follows up if answers are vague or incomplete.

Question Blueprints

Structured deep-dive questions with pre-written follow-ups ensuring consistent, fair evaluation across all candidates.

B1. How would you design a curriculum that balances traditional and digital art?

Knowledge areas to assess:

Curriculum alignmentResource managementStudent engagement strategiesAssessment methods

Pre-written follow-ups:

F1. How do you ensure all students benefit from both mediums?

F2. What challenges do you anticipate in integrating digital tools?

F3. How would you measure success in this curriculum?

B2. How do you approach classroom management in a dynamic art room setting?

Knowledge areas to assess:

Behavior management techniquesEngagement strategiesRoutine establishmentConflict resolution

Pre-written follow-ups:

F1. Can you provide an example of a challenging situation and your response?

F2. How do you balance creativity with structure?

F3. What role do students have in maintaining a positive environment?

Unlike plain questions where the AI invents follow-ups, blueprints ensure every candidate gets the exact same follow-up questions for fair comparison.

Custom Scoring Rubric

Defines how candidates are scored. Each dimension has a weight that determines its impact on the total score.

DimensionWeightDescription
Curriculum Design25%Ability to create engaging, standards-aligned art lessons.
Classroom Management20%Effective strategies for maintaining a positive learning environment.
Differentiated Instruction18%Adaptation of lessons to meet diverse student needs.
Family Engagement15%Skillful communication with families to support student learning.
Digital Tools Integration10%Incorporation of digital tools to enhance learning.
Problem-Solving7%Approach to resolving classroom challenges.
Blueprint Question Depth5%Coverage of structured deep-dive questions (auto-added)

Default rubric: Communication, Relevance, Technical Knowledge, Problem-Solving, Role Fit, Confidence, Behavioral Fit, Completeness. Auto-adds Language Proficiency and Blueprint Question Depth dimensions when configured.

Interview Settings

Configure duration, language, tone, and additional instructions.

Duration

40 min

Language

English

Template

Educational Expertise Screen

Video

Enabled

Language Proficiency Assessment

Englishminimum level: B2 (CEFR)3 questions

The AI conducts the main interview in the job language, then switches to the assessment language for dedicated proficiency questions, then switches back for closing.

Tone / Personality

Approachable yet professional. Emphasize pedagogical depth and practical classroom strategies. Encourage detailed examples and thoughtful reflections.

Adjusts the AI's speaking style but never overrides fairness and neutrality rules.

Company Instructions

We are a community-focused K-8 school with a commitment to arts education. We value creativity, inclusivity, and adaptive teaching methods. Promote a collaborative environment.

Injected into the AI's context so it can reference your company naturally and tailor questions to your environment.

Evaluation Notes

Prioritize candidates who demonstrate creativity, adaptability, and strong classroom management skills. Look for evidence of successful student engagement.

Passed to the scoring engine as additional context when generating scores. Influences how the AI weighs evidence.

Banned Topics / Compliance

Do not discuss salary, equity, or compensation. Do not ask about other schools the candidate is interviewing with.

The AI already avoids illegal/discriminatory questions by default. Use this for company-specific restrictions.

Sample Art Teacher Screening Report

This is what the hiring team receives after a candidate completes the AI interview — a detailed evaluation with scores, evidence, and recommendations.

Sample AI Screening Report

James Thompson

84/100Yes

Confidence: 89%

Recommendation Rationale

Candidate excels in curriculum design utilizing both traditional and digital media. Demonstrates solid classroom management with proactive strategies. Needs improvement in digital tools integration, particularly in leveraging edtech for student engagement.

Summary

James shows proficiency in balancing traditional and digital art curriculum. Strong classroom management skills with clear routines. Digital tool integration is an area for growth, particularly in student engagement via edtech.

Knockout Criteria

Teaching ExperiencePassed

Has 5 years of teaching experience, exceeding the minimum requirement.

AvailabilityPassed

Can start in 3 weeks, meeting the required timeline.

Must-Have Competencies

Curriculum DesignPassed
90%

Strong curriculum design incorporating both digital and traditional mediums.

Classroom ManagementPassed
88%

Effective classroom management strategies with proven results.

Family EngagementPassed
82%

Regular communication with families, though cultural sensitivity can improve.

Scoring Dimensions

Curriculum Designstrong
9/10 w:0.25

Demonstrated effective curriculum blending traditional and digital media.

I designed a unit incorporating Adobe Spark to create digital portfolios, aligning with Common Core standards, which increased student engagement by 30%.

Classroom Managementstrong
8/10 w:0.20

Showed effective use of de-escalation techniques and proactive routines.

In my class, I use a 'calm corner' and restorative circles, reducing disruptions by 40% over a semester.

Differentiated Instructionmoderate
8/10 w:0.20

Good understanding of tailoring lessons to diverse learning styles.

I use choice boards with options like digital art and sculpture, which cater to different learning preferences and increased participation by 25%.

Family Engagementmoderate
7/10 w:0.15

Communicates effectively with families, but lacks cultural sensitivity training.

I send bi-weekly newsletters and host family art nights, though I need to improve on language inclusivity.

Digital Tools Integrationweak
6/10 w:0.20

Limited use of digital tools for enhancing art education.

Currently, I use Google Classroom mainly for announcements, but I'm exploring how Kahoot can enhance formative assessments.

Blueprint Question Coverage

B1. How would you design a curriculum that balances traditional and digital art?

traditional media integrationdigital media projectsalignment with state standardsresource allocation

+ Blended curriculum with Adobe Spark and traditional media

+ Strong alignment with state standards

- Did not address resource constraints

B2. How do you approach classroom management in a dynamic art room setting?

proactive routinesde-escalation techniquesstudent engagement strategies

+ Effective use of restorative circles

+ Proactive routines reduced disruptions significantly

Language Assessment

English: assessed at B2+ (required: B2)

Interview Coverage

85%

Overall

4/4

Custom Questions

85%

Blueprint Qs

3/3

Competencies

5/5

Required Skills

3/6

Preferred Skills

100%

Language

Coverage gaps:

Edtech tool integrationCultural sensitivityResource allocation

Strengths

  • Blends traditional and digital art effectively
  • Strong classroom management skills
  • Engages families through regular communication
  • Proactive routines in classroom management

Risks

  • Limited digital tool integration
  • Needs cultural sensitivity in communication
  • Resource constraints not fully addressed

Notable Quotes

I designed a unit incorporating Adobe Spark to create digital portfolios, aligning with Common Core standards.
In my class, I use a 'calm corner' and restorative circles, reducing disruptions by 40%.
Currently, I use Google Classroom mainly for announcements, but I'm exploring how Kahoot can enhance formative assessments.

Interview Transcript (excerpt)

AI Interviewer

Hi James, I'm Alex, your AI interviewer for the Art Teacher position. Let's discuss your experience with curriculum design. Ready to start?

Candidate

Absolutely, I've been teaching for 5 years, focusing on blending traditional and digital art, using tools like Adobe Spark to enhance learning.

AI Interviewer

Great. How would you design a curriculum that balances traditional and digital art? What tools and methods do you employ?

Candidate

I integrate Adobe Spark for digital portfolios and use traditional media like charcoal and watercolor. This approach increased engagement by 30%.

AI Interviewer

Interesting. Can you elaborate on how you handle classroom management in a dynamic art room setting?

Candidate

I implement proactive routines and use 'calm corners' and restorative circles, reducing class disruptions by 40% over a semester.

... full transcript available in the report

Suggested Next Step

Proceed to the next interview round focusing on integrating digital tools like Nearpod or Kahoot into lesson plans. Assess his ability to advocate for the program with limited resources.

FAQ: Hiring Art Teachers with AI Screening

What art education topics does the AI screening interview cover?
The AI covers curriculum and lesson design, classroom management, differentiation and assessment, and family engagement. You can customize the topics and depth of follow-up questions based on the specific needs of your school or district.
How does the AI handle candidates who might inflate their teaching experience?
The AI uses scenario-based questions to probe for real classroom experience. If a candidate claims expertise in project-based instruction, the AI requests specific examples, challenges faced, and strategies used to overcome them.
How long does an art teacher screening interview take?
Interviews typically last 30-60 minutes, depending on your configuration. You can adjust the number of topics and depth of questions, and whether to include a language assessment. See AI Screenr pricing for more details.
Can the AI interview assess language proficiency for art teachers?
AI Screenr supports candidate interviews in 38 languages — including English, Spanish, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Polish, Czech, Slovak, Ukrainian, Romanian, Turkish, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Arabic, and Hindi among others. You configure the interview language per role, so art teachers are interviewed in the language best suited to your candidate pool. Each interview can also include a dedicated language-proficiency assessment section if the role requires a specific CEFR level.
How does AI Screenr compare to traditional interview methods for art teachers?
AI Screenr offers asynchronous interviews, freeing up scheduling constraints while providing detailed, structured assessments and a composite score, which can be more informative than traditional methods.
Can I customize the scoring rubric for art teacher candidates?
Yes, you can customize the scoring rubric to emphasize specific skills like classroom management or differentiated instruction, ensuring alignment with your school's priorities.
Does AI Screenr support integration with our existing education platforms?
AI Screenr integrates with various edtech tools and platforms like Google Classroom and Canvas. Learn more about how AI Screenr works to see integration possibilities.
How does the AI screen for different levels of art teachers?
AI Screenr adapts its questioning depth and complexity based on the seniority level defined in the job setup, ensuring that both mid-level and more experienced candidates are appropriately challenged.
What happens if a candidate performs poorly on a specific topic?
AI Screenr's structured rubric highlights strengths and weaknesses across topics, allowing you to see if a candidate's overall potential outweighs deficiencies in specific areas.
Can AI Screenr identify candidates who struggle with digital art tools?
Yes, the AI can assess familiarity and problem-solving with digital art tools, asking candidates to discuss their experiences and challenges in integrating these tools into their teaching.

Start screening art teachers with AI today

Start with 3 free interviews — no credit card required.

Try Free